MARC보기
LDR02309nam u200409 4500
001000000419529
00520190215163741
008181129s2018 |||||||||||||||||c||eng d
020 ▼a 9780438421998
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI10841521
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)upenngdas:13367
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 100
1001 ▼a Bernstein, Justin.
24513 ▼a An Act-focused Theory of Political Legitimacy.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of Pennsylvania., ▼c 2018.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2018.
300 ▼a 279 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.
500 ▼a Adviser: Samuel Freeman.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2018.
520 ▼a There is a moral presumption against the possession or exercise of coercive power, but political power is coercive. If we think that political power is sometimes morally justified, then given the moral presumption against coercive power, we need
520 ▼a This theory departs in significant respects from existing theories. In Part One of the dissertation, "Four Theses on Legitimacy," I argue that these departures are well-motivated given the shortcomings of these existing theories. I object that t
520 ▼a In Part Two, "An Act-Focused Consequentialist Theory of Legitimacy," I develop and defend a theory that embodies this novel approach. I argue that what legitimates particular actions---and, ultimately, the State---is the production of good conse
520 ▼a On this theory, a particular action by a state actor is legitimate if and only if the role-based reasons to perform the action are not outweighed by role-independent moral reasons. I propose that there is very strong moral reason to maximize Fun
590 ▼a School code: 0175.
650 4 ▼a Philosophy.
690 ▼a 0422
71020 ▼a University of Pennsylvania. ▼b Philosophy.
7730 ▼t Dissertation Abstracts International ▼g 80-01A(E).
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0175
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2018
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T14999790 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 201812 ▼f 2019
990 ▼a ***1012033