MARC보기
LDR02125nam u200421 4500
001000000421772
00520190215165606
008181129s2018 |||||||||||||||||c||eng d
020 ▼a 9780438168336
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI10817174
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)umn:19160
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 507
1001 ▼a Shenk, Lynne M.
24510 ▼a Student Reasoning Strategies Concerning Periodic Trends.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of Minnesota., ▼c 2018.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2018.
300 ▼a 212 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12(E), Section: A.
500 ▼a Adviser: Gillian H. Roehrig.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2018.
520 ▼a The periodic table is recognized as one of the most powerful tools in science. While it is included in virtually all high school and undergraduate general chemistry curricula, it remains a mystery to many chemistry students who find it impossibl
520 ▼a This study investigated student reasoning strategies used to explain periodic trends in atomic and ionic radius, ionization energy, electronegativity, and reactivity. A theoretical framework of scientific reasoning, as it applied to qualitative
520 ▼a The findings suggested that student understanding in the domain of electrostatic forces had the greatest influence on the type of reasoning strategies used. Those students with adequate understanding of electrostatic forces had more resources wi
590 ▼a School code: 0130.
650 4 ▼a Science education.
650 4 ▼a Chemistry.
690 ▼a 0714
690 ▼a 0485
71020 ▼a University of Minnesota. ▼b Education, Curriculum and Instruction.
7730 ▼t Dissertation Abstracts International ▼g 79-12A(E).
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0130
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2018
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T14998337 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 201812 ▼f 2019
990 ▼a ***1012033