| LDR | | 03439nam u200505 4500 |
| 001 | | 000000422463 |
| 005 | | 20190215170140 |
| 008 | | 181129s2018 |||||||||||||||||c||eng d |
| 020 | |
▼a 9780438322608 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI10841974 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)gwu:14303 |
| 040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 247004 |
| 082 | 0 |
▼a 614 |
| 100 | 1 |
▼a Srinivasan, Pavitra.
▼0 (orcid)0000-0003-1473-2221. |
| 245 | 10 |
▼a Carbon Budget and Cost Analysis of C2CNT: A Carbon Dioxide to Solid Carbon Conversion Process. |
| 260 | |
▼a [S.l.]:
▼b The George Washington University.,
▼c 2018. |
| 260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor:
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2018. |
| 300 | |
▼a 98 p. |
| 500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: B. |
| 500 | |
▼a Adviser: Peter T. LaPuma. |
| 502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Dr.P.H.)--The George Washington University, 2018. |
| 520 | |
▼a The industrial sector accounts for approximately 30% of global CO2 emissions as of 2015 and lacks mature technologies to substantially reduce emissions. Many industrial processes, such as cement production, emit carbon dioxide (CO2) without a vi |
| 520 | |
▼a Under the first research element the lifecycle carbon budget of a full scale model is assessed based on best available lab information. The research findings show electricity consumption is a key driver in the C2CNT carbon conversion process. By |
| 520 | |
▼a The C2CNT process could substantially lower the price of carbon nanotubes making it a valuable substitute for construction materials. C2CNT Carbon would therefore result in avoided CO2 emissions from other construction materials such as steel, a |
| 520 | |
▼a The carbon budget study demonstrates the C2CNT technology can substantially reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from industrial processes and could offer a revenue generating alternative compared to other Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) |
| 520 | |
▼a Under the second research element, an economic feasibility analysis is presented for C2CNT. The results estimate C2CNT operating costs are primarily driven by the 8.93 MWh of electricity/tonne of carbon, which at $80/MWh will cost {dollar |
| 520 | |
▼a Assuming the capital costs of building a C2CNT facility is similar to an aluminum smelter ($3,500--$5,000/tonne of installed capacity), a C2CNT facility capable of processing 2 million tonnes of CO2/year (typical CO2 emissions from |
| 520 | |
▼a This technology contrasts with other CDR technologies that often do not create a large revenue stream and create potential liabilities. |
| 520 | |
▼a Lastly, a sensitivity analysis indicates that a carbon nanotube price in the region of $3,000 is very likely to yield a positive Net Present Value (NPV) for a C2CNT plant and even prices below this have a high likelihood of a positive NPV |
| 590 | |
▼a School code: 0075. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Public health. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Climate change. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Energy. |
| 690 | |
▼a 0573 |
| 690 | |
▼a 0404 |
| 690 | |
▼a 0791 |
| 710 | 20 |
▼a The George Washington University.
▼b Environmental & Occupational Health. |
| 773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertation Abstracts International
▼g 80-01B(E). |
| 773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
| 790 | |
▼a 0075 |
| 791 | |
▼a Dr.P.H. |
| 792 | |
▼a 2018 |
| 793 | |
▼a English |
| 856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T14999815
▼n KERIS
▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
| 980 | |
▼a 201812
▼f 2019 |
| 990 | |
▼a ***1012033 |