MARC보기
LDR01947nam u200397 4500
001000000422747
00520190215170357
008181129s2016 |||||||||||||||||c||eng d
020 ▼a 9780438353008
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI10190634
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)umn:17313
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 320
1001 ▼a Sorenson, Maron W.
24514 ▼a The Impact of Institutional Rules on the U.S. Supreme Court.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of Minnesota., ▼c 2016.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2016.
300 ▼a 106 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.
500 ▼a Adviser: Timothy R. Johnson.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2016.
520 ▼a Assessing Judicial Certainty: The Supreme Court's Use of Questions and Statements During Oral Arguments: The United States Supreme Court hears oral arguments for every case granted full consideration. These proceedings are an hour in length with
520 ▼a The Supreme Court and Congress: Information and the Separation of Powers: If the U.S. constitution functions as it was intended, a system of checks and bal- ances should afford each branch a measure of power over the others. Separation of powers
520 ▼a How to Get Away With Murder: Killing Issues in the U.S. Supreme Court: The U.S. Supreme Court is not a self-starting institution
590 ▼a School code: 0130.
650 4 ▼a Political science.
690 ▼a 0615
71020 ▼a University of Minnesota. ▼b Political Science.
7730 ▼t Dissertation Abstracts International ▼g 80-01A(E).
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0130
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2016
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T14996520 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 201812 ▼f 2019
990 ▼a ***1012033