| LDR | | 00000nam u2200205 4500 |
| 001 | | 000000432594 |
| 005 | | 20200224132740 |
| 008 | | 200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d |
| 020 | |
▼a 9781085677400 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13901710 |
| 040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 247004 |
| 082 | 0 |
▼a 310 |
| 100 | 1 |
▼a Jones, Timothy. |
| 245 | 10 |
▼a Scalable Community Detection in Massive Networks Using Aggregated Relational Data. |
| 260 | |
▼a [S.l.]:
▼b Columbia University.,
▼c 2019. |
| 260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor:
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2019. |
| 300 | |
▼a 90 p. |
| 500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: B. |
| 500 | |
▼a Advisor: Zheng, Tian. |
| 502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2019. |
| 506 | |
▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors. |
| 506 | |
▼a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes. |
| 520 | |
▼a The analysis of networks is used in many fields of study including statistics, social science, computer sciences, physics, and biology. The interest in networks is diverse as it usually depends on the field of study. For instance, social scientists are interested in interpreting how edges arise, while biologists seek to understand underlying biological processes. Among the problems being explored in network analysis, community detection stands out as being one of the most important. Community detection seeks to find groups of nodes with a large concentration of links within but few between. Inferring groups are important in many applications as they are used for further downstream analysis. For example, identifying clusters of consumers with similar purchasing behavior in a customer and product network can be used to create better recommendation systems. Finding a node with a high concentration of its edges to other nodes in the community may give insight into how the community formed.Many statistical models for networks implicitly define the notion of a community. Statistical inference aims to fit a model that posits how vertices are connected to each other. One of the most common models for community detection is the stochastic block model (SBM) [Holland et al., 1983]. Although simple, it is a highly expressive family of random graphs. However, it does have its drawbacks. First, it does not capture the degree distribution of real-world networks. Second, it allows nodes to only belong to one community. In many applications, it is useful to consider overlapping communities. The Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodel (MMSB) is a Bayesian extension of the SBM that allows nodes to belong to multiple communities.Fitting large Bayesian network models quickly become computationally infeasible when the number of nodes grows into the hundred of thousands and millions. In particular, the number of parameters in the MMSB grows as the number of nodes squared. This thesis introduces an efficient method for fitting a Bayesian model to massive networks through use of aggregated relational data. Our inference method converges faster than existing methods by leveraging nodal information that often accompany real world networks. Conditioning on this extra information leads to a model that admits a parallel variational inference algorithm. We apply our method to a citation network with over three million nodes and 25 million edges. Our method converges faster than existing posterior inference algorithms for the MMSB and recovers parameters better on simulated networks generated according to the MMSB. |
| 590 | |
▼a School code: 0054. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Statistics. |
| 690 | |
▼a 0463 |
| 710 | 20 |
▼a Columbia University.
▼b Statistics. |
| 773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertations Abstracts International
▼g 81-04B. |
| 773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
| 790 | |
▼a 0054 |
| 791 | |
▼a Ph.D. |
| 792 | |
▼a 2019 |
| 793 | |
▼a English |
| 856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15492319
▼n KERIS
▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
| 980 | |
▼a 202002
▼f 2020 |
| 990 | |
▼a ***1008102 |
| 991 | |
▼a E-BOOK |