| LDR | | 00000nam u2200205 4500 |
| 001 | | 000000432828 |
| 005 | | 20200224140127 |
| 008 | | 200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d |
| 020 | |
▼a 9781085744867 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13860151 |
| 040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 247004 |
| 082 | 0 |
▼a 741 |
| 100 | 1 |
▼a Goehring, Billy. |
| 245 | 10 |
▼a Repurposing Deleuze and Design. |
| 260 | |
▼a [S.l.]:
▼b University of Oregon.,
▼c 2019. |
| 260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor:
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2019. |
| 300 | |
▼a 342 p. |
| 500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A. |
| 500 | |
▼a Advisor: Morar, Nicolae. |
| 502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2019. |
| 506 | |
▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors. |
| 506 | |
▼a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes. |
| 520 | |
▼a Gilles Deleuze's interdisciplinary reception privileges the term, "assemblage," but this translation runs the risk of appearing as jargon, whereas the original agencement would appear to a French audience as a more ordinary term. In the absence of a better alternative translation, I propose that we translate the problems motivating Deleuze's word choice rather than the word, agencement, itself. I consult a wide range of the figures influential for Deleuze and Felix Guattari who are relevant for the many contexts in which agencement appears in their work. This leads me to propose design as suitable terrain for redescribing Deleuze's philosophy.At the other end of the project, I note that design has its own share of problems. Theoretical approaches to design are often limited to particular kinds of design, and there are few efforts to reconcile design theories and definitions rooted in different designs, e.g. cinematography and engineering. Most accounts, though, define design primarily or exclusively in terms of its purpose or intended function. This poses problems for understanding changes in function and design's unintended effects. Deleuze scholarship and design both have problems, and therefore I use each as an intervention into the other: design affords us the opportunity to redescribe Deleuze's philosophy, while the problems at stake in Deleuze's philosophy allows us to redescribe design and treat design in a more comprehensive manner.In the end, I propose that we understand agencement as the interaction between coinciding, heterogeneous considerations or perspectives of the same substance |
| 590 | |
▼a School code: 0171. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Philosophy. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Design. |
| 690 | |
▼a 0422 |
| 690 | |
▼a 0389 |
| 710 | 20 |
▼a University of Oregon.
▼b Department of Philosophy. |
| 773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertations Abstracts International
▼g 81-03A. |
| 773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
| 790 | |
▼a 0171 |
| 791 | |
▼a Ph.D. |
| 792 | |
▼a 2019 |
| 793 | |
▼a English |
| 856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15490904
▼n KERIS
▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
| 980 | |
▼a 202002
▼f 2020 |
| 990 | |
▼a ***1008102 |
| 991 | |
▼a E-BOOK |