MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000433071
00520200225111925
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781088309377
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13809533
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 330
1001 ▼a Qiu, Yin Jia.
24510 ▼a Research Productivity and the Dynamic Allocation of NIH Grants.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b Yale University., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 91 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
500 ▼a Advisor: Berry, Steven T.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Yale University, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 ▼a This dissertation studies optimal funding allocation for Research and Development (R&D) on academic scientific research.Chapter 1 introduces institutional settings of academic scientific research and discusses previous progress in the literature of the economics of science.Chapter 2 introduces data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and uses this data to analyze the impact of funding on research output. I construct a panel dataset at the principal investigator (PI) and year level and estimate a research production function. Extending the previous literature, I explicitly incorporate funding dynamics into research production functions. I show that funding has dynamic effects on research output through the learning-by-doing channel and that the unobserved total factor productivity (TFP) at the PI level is persistent.Chapter 3 develops an empirical framework to study how the NIH could allocate research funding in a dynamically optimal manner, especially in terms of balancing funds between young and veteran PIs. Using estimates from Chapter 2, I formulate the planner (the NIH)'s funding allocation problem as a dynamic programming problem in which the planner maximizes the discounted sum of research output subject to a budget constraint. Because the planner's dynamic programming problem suffers from the curse of dimensionality, I adopt approximate dynamic programming methods from the operations research literature to allow computation. I provide three main results. First, a forward-looking policy with a discount factor of 0.9 funds 30% more young PIs than a myopic policy does, which translates to 5% more research output per year in the long run. Second, the NIH appears to be accounting for some intertemporal tradeoffs, but may still be underfunding young PIs: the discount factor that rationalizes the NIH's funding behavior is about 0.75. Finally, a temporary funding cut, similar to the one proposed by the current administration, would have a long-lasting effect on overall research output through its adverse impact on investment in young PIs.
590 ▼a School code: 0265.
650 4 ▼a Economics.
690 ▼a 0501
71020 ▼a Yale University. ▼b Economics.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-03A.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0265
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15490599 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1816162
991 ▼a E-BOOK