MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000433636
00520200225151840
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781687933461
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI22615093
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 300
1001 ▼a Breton, Etienne.
24510 ▼a Modernization and Household Change in India.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b Princeton University., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 157 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.
500 ▼a Advisor: Massey, Douglas S.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 ▼a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 ▼a The classical modernization hypothesis predicted that urbanization, industrialization and educational expansion would cause a worldwide convergence to small and nuclear households. Although rejected as a global theory of household change, this hypothesis remains central to household research in several countries. This is notably the case in India, where scholars still debate whether modernization has caused the disintegration of the traditional joint household system. This dissertation uses a mixed-methods approach to provide new insights into the study of modernization and household change in India. Over three empirical chapters, I develop and apply a common conceptual framework to investigate this relationship at three levels of analyses - national, subnational and local. All three chapters converge to show that modernization influences household patterns in India, although often in ways that contradict the classical modernization hypothesis. The first empirical chapter uses data from India's National Sample Survey (NSS) harmonized by IPUMS-International to show that there was no strong increase in nuclear households at the national-level over the past three to four decades. Further analyses reveal that the strongest driver of household nucleation has not been the emergence of a modern elite, but the economic stagnation or pauperization of segments of the population left behind by modernization. The second empirical chapter uses the same NSS dataset to explore state-level variations in household patterns. Results show significant regional differences, mainly between south India, where joint households are rare, and several states located in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, where the prevalence of joint households is highest. Further analyses show that modernization is a significant albeit weak predictor of these variations. The third empirical chapter combines data from my fieldwork and ICRISAT data to study the mechanisms linking modernization to household change in two villages in India's Deccan Plateau. I find that modernization has taken very different forms in these two villages, and thereby has had opposite implications for their patterns of household formation and composition. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that modernization is not a monolithic process leading to an ineluctable convergence to nuclear households, but instead hides multiple countervailing forces that both foster and curtail household nucleation.
590 ▼a School code: 0181.
650 4 ▼a Demography.
650 4 ▼a South Asian studies.
650 4 ▼a Individual & family studies.
650 4 ▼a Social research.
690 ▼a 0938
690 ▼a 0344
690 ▼a 0628
690 ▼a 0638
71020 ▼a Princeton University. ▼b Population Studies.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-05A.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0181
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15493270 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1008102
991 ▼a E-BOOK