MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000433929
00520200226134215
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781088383735
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI22616036
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 153
1001 ▼a Wisner, Kirsten.
24514 ▼a The Electronic Health Record's Impact on Labor and Delivery Nurses' Cognitive Work.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of California, San Francisco., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 184 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.
500 ▼a Advisor: Lyndon, Audrey.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Francisco, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 ▼a Background and objective: Despite recognition that electronic health record (EHR) use has introduced cognitive challenges for clinicians, few studies have evaluated its impact on the cognitive dimension of nurses' work. Labor and delivery nurses may encounter unique challenges when using the electronic health record since they also interact with an electronic fetal monitoring system. This study sought to explore labor and delivery nurses' perceptions of the EHR's impact on their cognitive work with the goal of identifying patient safety implications.Methods and setting: This was a grounded theory study using dimensional and situational analysis. Data were interviews and observations with 21 labor nurses at two community hospitals in the Western United States.Results: The ways that nurses configured care when using the EHR varied across participants and sites and depended on how easily they integrated it into their practice. Individual, group, and situational factors facilitated or constrained integration. This took place in a dynamic, high-acuity, specialty clinical environment while using EHRs that were not designed for pregnant women. Nurses used clinical decision support and other cognitive support features that rarely worked as intended due to the lack of EHR customization to account for pregnancy physiology and unique risk factors in the perinatal patient. Nurses viewed the quality of their relationships with patients and their families as an integral part of caring for laboring women and felt that interaction with the EHR sometimes threatened this dimension of their work.Conclusions: When nurses were unable to integrate the EHR into care it resulted in numerous consequences that have important safety implications. Available cognitive support features lacked the specialty-specific support needed to care for laboring women and instead required nurses to track information in other ways that added to their cognitive burden and work routines. As a result, nurses and patients were not benefitting from the intended decision support and patient safety protections offered by appropriate risk assessment screens or critical alerts. These findings have important implications for the configuration and design of EHRs in perinatal settings.
590 ▼a School code: 0034.
650 4 ▼a Nursing.
650 4 ▼a Information technology.
650 4 ▼a Obstetrics.
650 4 ▼a Medical personnel.
650 4 ▼a Public health.
650 4 ▼a Health sciences.
650 4 ▼a Mental health.
650 4 ▼a Psychobiology.
650 4 ▼a Physiological psychology.
650 4 ▼a Cognitive psychology.
690 ▼a 0569
690 ▼a 0489
690 ▼a 0380
690 ▼a 0573
690 ▼a 0566
690 ▼a 0349
690 ▼a 0207
690 ▼a 0633
690 ▼a 0347
690 ▼a 0989
71020 ▼a University of California, San Francisco. ▼b Nursing.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-05A.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0034
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15493353 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1008102
991 ▼a E-BOOK