MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000434095
00520200226140822
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781085570053
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13814520
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 575
1001 ▼a Samuels, Amanda N.
24510 ▼a Non-Canonical Functions of The Bacterial SOS Response.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of Pennsylvania., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 148 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02, Section: B.
500 ▼a Advisor: Kohli, Rahul M.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 ▼a DNA damage is a pervasive environmental threat, as such, most bacteria encode a network of genes called the SOS response that is poised to combat genotoxic stress. In the absence of DNA damage, the SOS response is repressed by LexA, a repressor-protease. In the presence of DNA damage, LexA undergoes a self-cleavage reaction relieving repression of SOS-controlled effector genes that promote bacterial survival. However, depending on the bacterial species, the SOS response has an expanded role beyond DNA repair, regulating genes involved in mutagenesis, virulence, persistence, and inter-species competition. Despite a plethora of research describing the significant consequences of the SOS response, it remains unknown what physiologic environments induce and require the SOS response for bacterial survival. In Chapter 2, we utilize a commensal E. coli strain, MP1, and established that the SOS response is critical for sustained colonization of the murine gut. Significantly, in evaluating the origin of the genotoxic stress, we found that the SOS response was nonessential for successful colonization in the absence of the endogenous gut microbiome, suggesting that competing microbes might be the source of genotoxic stress. MP1 has an antimicrobial colicin under control of the SOS response, and colicins are hypothesized to function in inter-species competition. In Chapter 3, we therefore investigated the role of colicin in promoting successful colonization of MP1. We found that in the healthy murine gut, sustained colonization does not require colicin production, thus suggesting that MP1 existing in its natural niche does not face colicin-required microbial competition. This finding calls into question the importance of colicins in an unperturbed environment. Finally, with increased recognition of variance in SOS effectors across bacterial species, we posited that there may be a corresponding diversity in the regulatory LexA self-cleavage reaction. In Chapter 4, we systematically characterized LexA from phylogenetically-diverse bacterial species, uncovering a wide range of self-cleavage rates across bacterial species. Overall, this thesis describes non-canonical aspects of the SOS response by first exploring physiologic environments that require SOS activation, then investigating DNA repair-independent consequence of SOS induction, and finally probing the LexA self-cleavage reaction from multiple bacterial species.
590 ▼a School code: 0175.
650 4 ▼a Microbiology.
650 4 ▼a Physiology.
650 4 ▼a Genetics.
690 ▼a 0410
690 ▼a 0369
690 ▼a 0719
71020 ▼a University of Pennsylvania. ▼b Cell and Molecular Biology.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-02B.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0175
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15490792 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1816162
991 ▼a E-BOOK