MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000434110
00520200226141032
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781085569385
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13814580
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 338
1001 ▼a Parker, Matthew Denson.
24510 ▼a Effects of Different Capital Sources on Maryland Oyster Aquaculture Operations.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of Maryland, College Park., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 182 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02, Section: A.
500 ▼a Advisor: Harrell, Reginal M.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 ▼a Aquaculture production of oysters has occurred in the state of Maryland since the 1890s, with limited success due to restrictive regulations and opposition from the commercial wild industry. After revision of the aquaculture leasing regulations in 2009, the Maryland oyster aquaculture industry expanded more than 10-fold. In 2010, Maryland Agricultural Resource Based Industry Development Corporation (MARBIDCO) started the Maryland Shellfish Aquaculture Loan fund, which features an interest-only period and partial-principle forgiveness. Loans taken through this program typically have a 3%, three-year, interest only period. If all interest only payments are made on time 40% of principle of the first loan is forgiven. Remaining principle is amortized at a rate of 5% over the remaining term of the loan. Any subsequent loans feature the same interest only period, however only 25% of the loan principle is forgiven. This study evaluated if there is any difference in farm accounting metrics when comparing self-financed operations, conventionally funded operations, and operations with MARBIDCO funding on water-column and bottom-culture oyster aquaculture operations. Bottom-culture and water-column operations had significantly higher net present value (NPV), internal rates of return (IRR), and accounting profit values when they were MARBIDCO-financed compared other sources of capital. Significant economies of scale were found in both bottom-culture and water-column operations, with larger operations having lower break-even costs. The effect of receiving payments for nutrient credits was evaluated for effects on farm accounting metrics. Operations that received nutrient payments had higher NPV, and IRR values, and accounting profit than those operations that did not receive nutrient payments. Nutrient credit payments, however, were unlikely to contribute substantially to operational success since they represent a small percentage of overall revenue. Successful operations were generally successful without nutrient credit payments
590 ▼a School code: 0117.
650 4 ▼a Environmental science.
650 4 ▼a Agricultural economics.
690 ▼a 0768
690 ▼a 0503
71020 ▼a University of Maryland, College Park. ▼b Marine-Estuarine-Environmental Sciences.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-02A.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0117
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15490798 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1816162
991 ▼a E-BOOK