MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000434264
00520200226143453
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781085690997
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI22587669
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 307
1001 ▼a Gim, Changdeok.
24510 ▼a Institutional Management for Infrastructure Resilience.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b Arizona State University., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 290 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
500 ▼a Advisor: Miller, Clark A.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 ▼a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 ▼a To improve the resilience of complex, interdependent infrastructures, we need to better understand the institutions that manage infrastructures and the work that they do. This research demonstrates that a key aspect of infrastructure resilience is the adequate institutional management of infrastructures. This research analyzes the institutional dimension of infrastructure resilience using sociotechnical systems theory and, further, investigates the critical role of institutions for infrastructure resilience using a thorough analysis of water and energy systems in Arizona. Infrastructure is not static, but dynamic. Institutions play a significant role in designing, building, maintaining, and upgrading dynamic infrastructures. Institutions create the appearance of infrastructure stability while dynamically changing infrastructures over time, which is resilience work. The resilience work of different institutions and organizations sustains, recovers, adapts, reconfigures, and transforms the physical structure on short, medium, and long temporal scales.To better understand and analyze the dynamics of sociotechnical infrastructure resilience, this research examines several case studies. The first is the social and institutional arrangements for the allocation of resources from Hoover Dam. This research uses an institutional analysis framework and draws on the institutional landscape of water and energy systems in Arizona. In particular, this research illustrates how institutions contribute to differing resilience work at temporal scales while fabricating three types of institutional threads: lateral, vertical, and longitudinal threads. This research also highlights the importance of institutional interdependence as a critical challenge for improving infrastructure resilience. Institutional changes in one system can disrupt other systems' performance. The research examines this through case studies that explore how changes to water governance impact the energy system in Arizona. Groundwater regulations affect the operation of thermoelectric power plants which withdraw groundwater for cooling. Generation turbines, droughts, and water governance are all intertwined via institutions in Arizona. This research, finally, expands and applies the interdependence perspective to a case study of forest management in Arizona. In a nutshell, the perilous combination of chronic droughts and the engineering resilience perspective jeopardizes urban water and energy systems. Wildfires caused by dense forests have legitimized an institutional transition, from thickening forests to thinning trees in Arizona.
590 ▼a School code: 0010.
650 4 ▼a Environmental studies.
650 4 ▼a Climate change.
650 4 ▼a Urban planning.
690 ▼a 0477
690 ▼a 0404
690 ▼a 0999
71020 ▼a Arizona State University. ▼b Environmental Social Science.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-03A.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0010
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15493016 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1008102
991 ▼a E-BOOK