| LDR | | 00000nam u2200205 4500 |
| 001 | | 000000434694 |
| 005 | | 20200227094717 |
| 008 | | 200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d |
| 020 | |
▼a 9781392556603 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI27540295 |
| 040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 247004 |
| 082 | 0 |
▼a 658 |
| 100 | 1 |
▼a Poggioli, Nicholas Alan. |
| 245 | 10 |
▼a Do Stakeholders Connect Corporate Social Responsibility to Firm Performance? Testing Stakeholder Influence Capacity Theory. |
| 260 | |
▼a [S.l.]:
▼b University of Minnesota.,
▼c 2019. |
| 260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor:
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2019. |
| 300 | |
▼a 245 p. |
| 500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A. |
| 500 | |
▼a Advisor: Marcus, Alfred A. |
| 502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2019. |
| 506 | |
▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors. |
| 520 | |
▼a This dissertation tests stakeholder influence capacity theory predicting corporate social responsibility affects firm performance by first influencing the behavior of a firm's stakeholders. In a series of chapters, the dissertation reviews research at the intersection of corporate social responsibility and stakeholder management, uses causal inference research designs to test for a direct effect of responsibility on performance, tests whether stakeholder influence capacity mediates the responsibility-performance relationship as predicted by stakeholder influence capacity theory, and tests whether stakeholder influence capacity is stakeholder-specific rather than a single firm capability applicable to all stakeholders.The findings are the following. First, they support the responsibility literature's lack of consensus about a main effect of responsibility on performance. Second, there is mixed evidence for whether stakeholder influence capacity mediates the effect of responsibility on performance, with some models showing partial mediation, some full mediation, and others no mediation. Third, stakeholder-specific mediation tests provide some evidence that stakeholder influence capacity varies by stakeholder group, with no evidence for customer stakeholders, some evidence for employee stakeholders, and strong evidence for environment stakeholders.These findings suggest the responsibility performance literature's lack of consensus around an effect of responsibility on performance could be due to lack of attention to the specific mechanism that connects corporate responsibility actions to performance. Lack of attention to mechanisms was identified at least two decades ago, but only now are scholars beginning to specify and test mechanisms. Stakeholder influence capacity theory advances responsibility research by proposing a stakeholder influence capacity mechanism connecting responsibility to performance. This dissertation is one of the first empirical tests of stakeholder influence capacity theory's mediation hypothesis. Prior work tested stakeholder influence capacity as a moderation hypothesis |
| 590 | |
▼a School code: 0130. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Business administration. |
| 690 | |
▼a 0310 |
| 710 | 20 |
▼a University of Minnesota.
▼b Business Administration. |
| 773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertations Abstracts International
▼g 81-06A. |
| 773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
| 790 | |
▼a 0130 |
| 791 | |
▼a Ph.D. |
| 792 | |
▼a 2019 |
| 793 | |
▼a English |
| 856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15494396
▼n KERIS
▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
| 980 | |
▼a 202002
▼f 2020 |
| 990 | |
▼a ***1008102 |
| 991 | |
▼a E-BOOK |