MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000434724
00520200227102225
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781687940049
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI22623457
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 100
1001 ▼a Lavin, Andrew.
24510 ▼a Normality Judgments: Structure and Content.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of California, Los Angeles., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 213 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
500 ▼a Advisor: Lawrence, Gavin
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 ▼a A normality judgment is a type of generalization that ascribes a normal feature or property to a kind. The explanatory link account of normality-an account of what it is to be a normal feature or property and therefore an account of the content of a normality judgment-is defended in this dissertation. According to the explanatory link account, a feature is normal for a kind if and only if an individual's possession of that feature is explained by its being a member of that kind. The account is inspired by the Aristotelian notion that being a carpenter explains one's house-building activities whereas being a grammarian wouldn't explain the same. The second chapter defends this form of explanation-called herein "kind explanation." The dissertation closes with a study of the extensional relationship between normality and statistical regularity, and finally with a study of the inferential profile of normality judgments.
590 ▼a School code: 0031.
650 4 ▼a Philosophy.
690 ▼a 0422
71020 ▼a University of California, Los Angeles. ▼b Philosophy 0651.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-04A.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0031
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15494002 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1008102
991 ▼a E-BOOK