| LDR | | 00000nam u2200205 4500 |
| 001 | | 000000435266 |
| 005 | | 20200228090822 |
| 008 | | 200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d |
| 020 | |
▼a 9781085792820 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13885673 |
| 040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 247004 |
| 082 | 0 |
▼a 895 |
| 100 | 1 |
▼a Marks, James Michael. |
| 245 | 10 |
▼a Playfighting: Encountering Aviddhakarn黔a and Bhavivikta in Santaraks黔ita's Tattvasam黔graha and Kamalasila's Panjika. |
| 260 | |
▼a [S.l.]:
▼b University of California, Berkeley.,
▼c 2019. |
| 260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor:
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2019. |
| 300 | |
▼a 318 p. |
| 500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A. |
| 500 | |
▼a Advisor: von Rospatt, Alexander. |
| 502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2019. |
| 506 | |
▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors. |
| 520 | |
▼a The present study collects, translates, and analyzes the surviving fragments of two lost Naiyayika authors, Aviddhakarn黔a and Bhavivikta, principally as they have been preserved in the works of the eighth-century Buddhist philosophers Santaraks黔ita and Kamalasila. (The present study argues, without coming to a definite conclusion as yet, that there is strong evidence Aviddhakarn黔a and Bhavivikta are not two distinct authors but different names for the same man.) The fragments themselves often contain fascinating and idiosyncratic arguments but are also often difficult to interpret. Unpacking them requires close consultation of major Nyaya-Vaises黔ika works, primarily the Nyayasutra, Vatsyayana's Nyayabhas黔ya, which is the direct source material for most of the fragments, Uddyotakara's Nyayavarttika, which often parallels the arguments in the fragments, and Prasastapada's Padarthadharmasam黔graha, which clarifies much of the technical terminology tersely packed into the most difficult of the fragments. The majority of the fragments are preserved in Kamalasila's Panjika, his commentary on his teacher Santaraks黔ita's Tattvasam黔graha. Santaraks黔ita invokes, and Kamalasila cites, Aviddhakarn黔a and Bhavivikta in chapters concerning cosmology (2), the self (7), momentariness (8), the Vaises黔ika categories of substance (10), quality (11), and universals (13), and the epistemological issues of perception (17), inference (18), and the existence of other means of knowledge (19). The fragments, accordingly, cover an extremely broad range of issues and, so, serve as an occasion to consider a number of questions about the intellectual commitments of the early Nyaya-Vaises黔ika community and various disputes between Buddhists and Naiyayikas. Several of the fragments also derive from Aviddhakarn黔a's Carvaka commentary, allowing for a discussion of the relation between Brahmanical philosophical traditions and the materialist Carvaka philosophy. Finally, because the fragments are preserved in the Panjika, they make possible a thorough analysis of the structure and style of the Tattvasam黔graha as a whole, as well as the way the Buddhists represent the many rival thinkers they cite. The present study mirrors the structure of the Tattvasam黔graha, using the fragments as anchor points in a reading of the text's overall engagement with Nyaya-Vaises黔ika, in order to argue that Santaraks黔ita organizes his work in a dialogical manner. |
| 590 | |
▼a School code: 0028. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Philosophy. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Asian literature. |
| 690 | |
▼a 0422 |
| 690 | |
▼a 0305 |
| 710 | 20 |
▼a University of California, Berkeley.
▼b Buddhist Studies. |
| 773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertations Abstracts International
▼g 81-04A. |
| 773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
| 790 | |
▼a 0028 |
| 791 | |
▼a Ph.D. |
| 792 | |
▼a 2019 |
| 793 | |
▼a English |
| 856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15491458
▼n KERIS
▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
| 980 | |
▼a 202002
▼f 2020 |
| 990 | |
▼a ***1816162 |
| 991 | |
▼a E-BOOK |