MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000435271
00520200228090903
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781392239889
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13885790
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)indiana:15795
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 612
1001 ▼a Fulton, Timothy John.
24510 ▼a Influence of Diaphragm Fatigue on Exercise Performance and Locomotor Muscle Fatigue.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b Indiana University., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 105 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
500 ▼a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 ▼a Advisor: Chapman, Robert F.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 ▼a To determine if respiratory muscle fatigue alters central motor output, locomotor muscle fatigue, and exercise performance, eight trained cyclists performed 5 km cycling time trials under control conditions (CON) and after a resistive breathing task that induced respiratory muscle fatigue (RMF). Central motor drive was estimated using vastus lateralis surface electromyography (EMG) and expressed as a percent of EMG during maximal contractions. Locomotor muscle fatigue was assessed by measuring potentiated quadriceps twitch force before and after each cycling time trial and expressed as a percent change from baseline. Time to complete the time trial was ~2% longer (i.e. worse performance) in RMF compared with CON (464 짹 24 v. 455 짹 26 sec, P < 0.001). Locomotor muscle fatigue was attenuated in RMF compared with CON (-22 + 6%, v. -28 짹 7%, P = 0.02). Central motor output was lower in RMF compared with CON during the first and second km (45 짹 11 v. 53 짹 13%, P = 0.004 and 45 짹 14 v. 51 짹 14%, P = 0.008, respectively), but was not different thereafter. Power output was lower in RMF compared with CON during the first and second km (308 짹 62 v. 370 짹 92 W, P = 0.012 and 300 짹 53 v. 321 짹 51 W, P = 0.009, respectively), but was not different thereafter. Although minute ventilation was lower in RMF compared with CON during the first and second km (114 짹 19 v. 135 짹 24 L min-1, P = 0.003 and 136 짹 23 v. 152 짹 31 L min-1, P = 0.009, respectively), ratings of dyspnea were similar (4 짹 1 v. 5 짹 2 and 6 짹 1 v. 6 짹 2, respectively). It seems that alterations to dyspnea for a given minute ventilation, secondary to respiratory muscle fatigue, constrained central motor drive and power output during cycling exercise, thereby limiting the development of locomotor muscle fatigue. These findings indicate that the respiratory system influences the sensory tolerance limit and is an integral component in a global negative feedback loop that regulates exercise performance and the development of locomotor muscle fatigue.
590 ▼a School code: 0093.
650 4 ▼a Kinesiology.
690 ▼a 0575
71020 ▼a Indiana University. ▼b School of Public Health.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 80-12B.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0093
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15491463 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1816162
991 ▼a E-BOOK