MARC보기
LDR00000nam u2200205 4500
001000000435340
00520200228093151
008200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 ▼a 9781085793810
035 ▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI13884542
040 ▼a MiAaPQ ▼c MiAaPQ ▼d 247004
0820 ▼a 153
1001 ▼a Stepien-Bernabe, Natalie Nicole.
24514 ▼a The Impact of Technology and Presentation Mode on Reading Comprehension Among Blind and Sighted Individuals.
260 ▼a [S.l.]: ▼b University of California, Berkeley., ▼c 2019.
260 1 ▼a Ann Arbor: ▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c 2019.
300 ▼a 100 p.
500 ▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
500 ▼a Advisor: Orel-Bixler, Deborah.
5021 ▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2019.
506 ▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 ▼a Rapid advances in technology are facilitating the electronic distribution of information, especially via auditory formats. These methods of acquiring information are prevalent in educational settings, such as the use of audiobooks. While auditory formats may be more convenient and economical, they may not be the most beneficial for comprehension ability. In fact, previous research has shown that reading rather than listening leads to superior comprehension among sighted individuals. Two possible explanations for this benefit incomprehension exist: (1) Visual processing is fundamental for reading comprehension, or (2) Reading text is more physically-engaging and effortful than listening, leading to better comprehension ability. This dissertation presents research that contributes to this debate by comparing reading and listening comprehension between sighted individuals and blind, fluent braille readers.The findings from this research clarify how distributing reading material using different technologies and presentation modes affects comprehension ability. These results are particularly essential for the blind community because previous research on this topic is severely lacking, and currently-used assistive technology primarily presents reading materials in auditory formats. Furthermore, this research is the first to create an assessment that accurately measures comprehension ability among two distinct participant populations, allowing for comparisons between blind and sighted individuals. The benefit of making such comparisons for elucidating the neural underpinnings of cognitive processes, such as comprehension, will be discussed as a novel methodological technique.
590 ▼a School code: 0028.
650 4 ▼a Experimental psychology.
650 4 ▼a Reading instruction.
650 4 ▼a Pedagogy.
650 4 ▼a Educational evaluation.
650 4 ▼a Instructional design.
650 4 ▼a Neurosciences.
650 4 ▼a Educational technology.
650 4 ▼a Psychobiology.
650 4 ▼a Physiological psychology.
650 4 ▼a Disability studies.
650 4 ▼a Curriculum development.
650 4 ▼a Educational psychology.
650 4 ▼a Special education.
650 4 ▼a Cognitive psychology.
690 ▼a 0623
690 ▼a 0443
690 ▼a 0201
690 ▼a 0349
690 ▼a 0525
690 ▼a 0447
690 ▼a 0727
690 ▼a 0529
690 ▼a 0989
690 ▼a 0456
690 ▼a 0317
690 ▼a 0710
690 ▼a 0633
690 ▼a 0535
71020 ▼a University of California, Berkeley. ▼b Vision Science.
7730 ▼t Dissertations Abstracts International ▼g 81-04A.
773 ▼t Dissertation Abstract International
790 ▼a 0028
791 ▼a Ph.D.
792 ▼a 2019
793 ▼a English
85640 ▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15491373 ▼n KERIS ▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
980 ▼a 202002 ▼f 2020
990 ▼a ***1816162
991 ▼a E-BOOK