| LDR | | 00000nam u2200205 4500 |
| 001 | | 000000436023 |
| 005 | | 20200228112245 |
| 008 | | 200131s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d |
| 020 | |
▼a 9781392634332 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)AAI27712112 |
| 035 | |
▼a (MiAaPQ)OhioLINKosu1559298189559479 |
| 040 | |
▼a MiAaPQ
▼c MiAaPQ
▼d 247004 |
| 082 | 0 |
▼a 152 |
| 100 | 1 |
▼a Wilson, Anne Cathryn. |
| 245 | 14 |
▼a The Impact of an Emotion Malleability Belief Manipulation on Emotion Regulation. |
| 260 | |
▼a [S.l.]:
▼b The Ohio State University.,
▼c 2019. |
| 260 | 1 |
▼a Ann Arbor:
▼b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
▼c 2019. |
| 300 | |
▼a 198 p. |
| 500 | |
▼a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: B. |
| 500 | |
▼a Advisor: Cheavens, Jennifer. |
| 502 | 1 |
▼a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2019. |
| 506 | |
▼a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors. |
| 520 | |
▼a Extant research points to a link between emotion regulation and psychological functioning. In particular, research suggests that how individuals choose to regulate their emotions (i.e., strategy selection) and how well they enact their chosen strategy (i.e. implementation) impact emotional and psychological functioning. Emerging research suggests that implicit beliefs about emotion (i.e., beliefs about whether emotions can or cannot be changed) may be one factor influencing emotion regulation choice and implementation. However, it remains unclear whether beliefs about emotion can be manipulated, and if doing so leads to more adaptive emotion regulation choice and implementation. Therefore, the aim of this dissertation is to clarify and explore the relationship between emotion malleability beliefs, emotion regulation, and psychological functioning in a series of three experiments. In each experiment, we randomly assigned participants to receive information stating that emotions either can be changed (malleable condition) or cannot be changed (fixed condition). In Studies 1 and 2, we examined the impact of the malleability belief manipulation on emotion regulation choice and positive and negative affect across two different emotional situations. In Study 3, we tested whether the malleability belief manipulation impacted emotion regulation implementation, specifically cognitive reappraisal. Results suggest that the malleability manipulation was successful in altering beliefs about emotion (Studies 1, 2, 3). In terms of emotion regulation, we found some evidence to suggest that the manipulation impacts emotion regulation choice, but not implementation. Across all studies, telling people that emotions can change led to a short-term increase in positive affect |
| 590 | |
▼a School code: 0168. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Clinical psychology. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Personality psychology. |
| 650 | 4 |
▼a Experimental psychology. |
| 690 | |
▼a 0622 |
| 690 | |
▼a 0625 |
| 690 | |
▼a 0623 |
| 710 | 20 |
▼a The Ohio State University.
▼b Psychology. |
| 773 | 0 |
▼t Dissertations Abstracts International
▼g 81-06B. |
| 773 | |
▼t Dissertation Abstract International |
| 790 | |
▼a 0168 |
| 791 | |
▼a Ph.D. |
| 792 | |
▼a 2019 |
| 793 | |
▼a English |
| 856 | 40 |
▼u http://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T15494745
▼n KERIS
▼z 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
| 980 | |
▼a 202002
▼f 2020 |
| 990 | |
▼a ***1816162 |
| 991 | |
▼a E-BOOK |