MARC보기
LDR04348cam a2200673 i 4500
001000000464867
00520220105143310
006m d
007cr |||||||||||
008210804s2021 nyu ob 001 0 eng
010 ▼a 2021038479
020 ▼a 0197556825 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 9780197556849 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0197556841 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 9780197556832 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 0197556833 ▼q electronic book
020 ▼a 9780197556825 ▼q (electronic bk.)
020 ▼z 9780197556818 ▼q hardcover
020 ▼z 0197556817 ▼q hardcover
035 ▼a 3070811 ▼b (N$T)
035 ▼a (OCoLC)1257402066
040 ▼a DLC ▼b eng ▼e rda ▼c DLC ▼d YDX ▼d OCLCO ▼d OCLCF ▼d EBLCP ▼d YDX ▼d N$T ▼d 247004
042 ▼a pcc
043 ▼a n-us---
05004 ▼a KF1306.C64 ▼b H87 2021
08200 ▼a 342.7308/8 ▼2 23
1001 ▼a Huq, Aziz Z., ▼e author.
24514 ▼a The collapse of constitutional remedies/ ▼c Aziz Z. Huq.
260 ▼a New York, NY: ▼b Oxford University Press, ▼c [2021].
300 ▼a 1 online resource.
336 ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent
337 ▼a computer ▼b c ▼2 rdamedia
338 ▼a online resource ▼b cr ▼2 rdacarrier
4901 ▼a Inalienable rights series
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index.
5050 ▼a Blueprint -- Building -- Remedies -- Collapse -- Remains.
520 ▼a "This book describes and explains the failure of the federal courts of the United States to act and to provide remedies to individuals whose constitutional rights have been violated by illegal state coercion and violence. This remedial vacuum must be understood in light of the original design and historical development of the federal courts. At its conception, the federal judiciary was assumed to be independent thanks to an apolitical appointment process, a limited supply of adequately trained lawyers (which would prevent cherry-picking), and the constraining effect of laws and constitutional provision. Each of these checks quickly failed. As a result, the early federal judicial system was highly dependent on Congress. Not until the last quarter of the nineteenth century did a robust federal judiciary start to emerge, and not until the first quarter of the twentieth century did it take anything like its present form. The book then charts how the pressure from Congress and the White House has continued to shape courts behaviour-first eliciting a mid-twentieth-century explosion in individual remedies, and then driving a five-decade long collapse. Judges themselves have not avidly resisted this decline, in part because of ideological reasons and in part out of institutional worries about a ballooning docket. Today, as a result of these trends, the courts are stingy with individual remedies, but aggressively enforce the so-called "structural" constitution of the separation of powers and federalism. This cocktail has highly regressive effects, and is in urgent need of reform"-- ▼c Provided by publisher.
588 ▼a Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on December 03, 2021).
590 ▼a Added to collection customer.56279.3
650 0 ▼a Constitutional torts ▼z United States.
650 0 ▼a Government liability ▼z United States.
650 0 ▼a Remedies (Law) ▼z United States.
650 0 ▼a Judicial independence ▼z United States.
650 0 ▼a Political questions and judicial power ▼z United States.
650 7 ▼a Constitutional torts. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00875850
650 7 ▼a Government liability. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00945404
650 7 ▼a Judicial independence. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst00984681
650 7 ▼a Political questions and judicial power. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01069674
650 7 ▼a Remedies (Law) ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01094419
651 7 ▼a United States. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01204155
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77508 ▼i Online version: ▼a Huq, Aziz Z. ▼t Collapse of constitutional remedies ▼d New York : Oxford University Press, [2021] ▼z 9780197556832 ▼w (DLC) 2021038479
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼z 0197556817 ▼z 9780197556818 ▼w (OCoLC)1241730830
830 0 ▼a Inalienable rights series.
85640 ▼3 EBSCOhost ▼u https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=3070811
938 ▼a EBSCOhost ▼b EBSC ▼n 3070811
990 ▼a ***1012033
991 ▼a E-BOOK
994 ▼a 92 ▼b N$T