자료유형 | 학위논문 |
---|---|
서명/저자사항 | Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Emergency Medicine. |
개인저자 | Zupon, Alyssa Brenda. |
단체저자명 | Yale University. Yale School of Medicine. |
발행사항 | [S.l.]: Yale University., 2018. |
발행사항 | Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018. |
형태사항 | 63 p. |
기본자료 저록 | Dissertation Abstracts International 79-11B(E). Dissertation Abstract International |
ISBN | 9780438132245 |
학위논문주기 | Thesis (M.D.)--Yale University, 2018. |
일반주기 |
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11(E), Section: B.
Adviser: Arjun Venkatesh. |
요약 | Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) since 1990 to advance the delivery of emergency medical care. These guidelines have raised controversy, and recent research shows that |
요약 | The AGREE II instrument contains 23 appraisal items (scored on a 1 - 7 scale) in six quality domains and two overall assessments. The domains are Scope and Purpose, Stakeholder Involvement, Rigor of Development, Clarity of Presentation, Applicab |
요약 | Twenty guidelines published from October 2008 to November 2017 were included. Of the six domains, Scope and Purpose scored highest and varied least (mean 90%, coefficient of variation (CV) 0.03), while Applicability scored lowest and varied most |
요약 | Based on validated criteria, ACEP Clinical Policies have identifiable areas of strength and weakness. The overall CPG quality did not improve over time and is not explained by the quality of underlying evidence. ACEP Clinical Policies can be imp |
일반주제명 | Medicine. |
언어 | 영어 |
바로가기 |
: 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |