자료유형 | 학위논문 |
---|---|
서명/저자사항 | A Logical Theory of Confirmation. |
개인저자 | Ahmed-Buehler, Russell Joseph. |
단체저자명 | University of California, Berkeley. Logic & the Methodology of Science. |
발행사항 | [S.l.]: University of California, Berkeley., 2019. |
발행사항 | Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019. |
형태사항 | 215 p. |
기본자료 저록 | Dissertations Abstracts International 81-06A. Dissertation Abstract International |
ISBN | 9781392546048 |
학위논문주기 | Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2019. |
일반주기 |
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A.
Advisor: Buchak, Lara. |
이용제한사항 | This item must not be sold to any third party vendors. |
요약 | This dissertation concerns the interpretation and structure of two intuitive notions: rational credence and confirmation. Probabilistic accounts of rational credence currently enjoy a position of considerable prestige, underwriting significant work not only in philosophy but also in economics and statistics. Confirmation, in contrast, is widely regarded as ill-formed, a misleading misconception akin to phlogiston, witches, or cosmic ether (de Finetti x). The primary project of this dissertation is to undercut the contemporary consensus on both notions by first demonstrating a systemic weakness in probabilistic accounts of rational credence (part I) and then providing a non-probabilistic account of confirmation (part II). Since any adequate account of confirmation is prima facie an adequate account of rational credence, the negative work of part one dovetails with the positive account offered in part two. Confirmation is no misleading misconception, and rational credences are not probability functions. |
일반주제명 | Logic. Philosophy of science. Epistemology. |
언어 | 영어 |
바로가기 |
: 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |