상세정보
Export to Refworks부가기능
Law and mental health [electronic resource] a case-based approach/ Second edition
상세 프로파일
| 자료유형 | 단행본 |
|---|---|
| 서명/저자사항 | Law and mental health : a case-based approach/ Christopher M. Weaver, Robert G. Meyer. [electronic resource]. |
| 개인저자 | Weaver, Christopher M.,author. Meyer, Robert G.,author, |
| 판사항 | Second edition. |
| 발행사항 | New York: The Guilford Press, [2019]. |
| 형태사항 | 1 online resource. |
| 기타형태 저록 | Print version: 1462540473 9781462540471 |
| ISBN | 1462540503 9781462540501 |
| 서지주기 | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
| 내용주기 | Cover; Half Title Page; Title Page; Copyright; Dedication; About the Authors; Author's Note: Opportunities Gained; Acknowledgments; Contents; Introduction; Part I. Psychological Issues and Involvement in Basic Courtroom Proceedings; 1. Jury Selection and Process: Precedent Impacting Jury Consultation and Research; The Case of the Mitchell-Stans Conspiracy Trial: The Importance of Consistent Jury Selection Procedures; The Case of Batson v. Kentucky (1986): Juror Race in Jury Selection; The Case of Snyder v. Louisiana (2008): Refining Requirements for Race-Neutral Explanations 2. Admission of Expert Testimony and the EyewitnessThe Case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993): The Evolution of Qualifications for the Admissibility of Expert Testimony; The Case of Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999): Clarifying the Applicability of Daubert; The Case of Perry v. New Hampshire (2012): Eyewitness Testimony Goes to the U.S. Supreme Court; Part II. Legal Precedent in Everyday Clinical Practice; 3. Informed Consent; The Case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966): The Importance of Disclosure; The Case of Zinermon v. Burch (1990): The Importance of Capacity 4. Confidentiality and Privileged CommunicationThe Case of In re Lifschutz (1970): Therapist-Patient Privilege and Privilege Waiver; The Case of Jaffee v. Redmond (1996): Broadening Therapist-Client Privilege; 5. Duty to Warn and Protect; The Case of Tarasoff v. the Regents of the University of California (1976): Dangerousness to Others and the Duty to Warn and Protect; The Case of Almonte v. New York Medical College (1994): Duty to Warn and Protect a Nonspecified Victim; The Case of Garner v. Stone (1973): Confidentiality and the Duty Not to Warn and Protect Part III. Clinical Forensic Evaluation6. Competency; The Case of Dusky v. United States (1959): Defining Due Process Standards in Competency to Stand Trial Cases; The Case of Godinez v. Moran (1993): The Constitutional Basis for Separate Competencies; The Case of Indiana v. Edwards (2008): The Contemporary Importance of Competency Guidelines; 7. Insanity and Criminal Responsibility; The Case of In re M'Naghten (1843): The First Formal Test of Criminal Responsibility; The Case of John Hinckley: Public Outcry Spurring Insanity Defense Reform The Case of Clark v. Arizona (2006): State Discretion in Adopting Custom Standards and Limiting Expert Testimony on Mental Illness8. Civil Commitment and Dangerousness; The Case of O'Connor v. Donaldson (1975): The Criteria for Involuntary Commitment; The Case of Foucha v. Louisiana (1992): Dangerousness and Mental Illness as Criteria for Indefinite Commitment; 9. Hypnosis and the Polygraph; The Case of the Hillside Strangler: The Veracity of Hypnosis in a Forensic Setting; The Case of Rock v. Arkansas (1987): U.S. Supreme Court Acknowledgment of Hurd Criteria |
| 요약 | "Favored by instructors and students for its real-world focus and engaging style, this authoritative text on the interface of psychology and law has now been revised and expanded. Each chapter provides an overview of case law on an important topic and explores selected cases in depth. Coverage includes psychological and mental health issues in criminal and civil proceedings; the role of practitioners as expert witnesses and forensic consultants; and legal concerns in general clinical practice. Salient legal processes and decisions are summarized and implications for today's clinical and forensic practitioners highlighted. Instructors who request a desk copy receive a supplemental Test Bank with questions keyed to each chapter. Students can access a downloadable Study Guide. New to This Edition *Updated throughout with current research and substantive changes in mental health law. *Chapter on competency in juvenile justice. *Citations of 115 new legal cases. *Conclusion identifying urgent social challenges facing the field. Subject areas/key words: forensic psychology , mental health law, psychology and law, law and behavioral science, legal cases, expert testimony, expert witnesses, case law, legal precedents, forensic mental health, forensic psychological assessments, forensic assessments, forensic psychological evaluations, psychiatric examination, juvenile justice, psychopathy, liability, malpractice, textbooks, casebooks, texts Audience: Students and practitioners in clinical and forensic psychology, psychiatry, and social work; also of interest in criminal justice and criminology"-- |
| 해제 | Provided by publisher. |
| 주제명(지명) | United States. --fast |
| 일반주제명 | Mental health laws --United States --Cases. Insanity (Law) --United States --Cases. Forensic psychiatry --United States --Cases. Forensic psychiatry. Insanity (Law) Mental health laws. |
| 언어 | 영어 |
| 바로가기 |  |
