상세정보
Export to Refworks부가기능
Who Speaks for Deer?: Including Nonhumans in Deliberative Democracy through Multispecies Communicative Democracy and Democratic Education
상세 프로파일
| 자료유형 | 학위논문 |
|---|---|
| 서명/저자사항 | Who Speaks for Deer?: Including Nonhumans in Deliberative Democracy through Multispecies Communicative Democracy and Democratic Education. |
| 개인저자 | Vrla, Stephen Patrick. |
| 단체저자명 | Michigan State University. Sociology - Doctor of Philosophy. |
| 발행사항 | [S.l.]: Michigan State University., 2019. |
| 발행사항 | Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019. |
| 형태사항 | 211 p. |
| 기본자료 저록 | Dissertations Abstracts International 81-03B. Dissertation Abstract International |
| ISBN | 9781085676243 |
| 학위논문주기 | Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2019. |
| 일반주기 |
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.
Advisor: Kalof, Linda |
| 이용제한사항 | This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.This item must not be added to any third party search indexes. |
| 요약 | Humans face a wide range of environmental issues, many of which are characterized by scientific uncertainty and values disagreement. One promising approach to solving these issues is deliberative democracy, a model of democratic decision making in which all those affected by a decision share their positions on it with one another and work toward a consensus. However, scholars and practitioners of deliberative democracy have largely overlooked nonhuman animals, ecosystems, and other nonhuman stakeholders affected by environmental issues and decisions about them. This dissertation uses the perspectives of environmental sociology, education, and policy to look closely at how deliberative democracy can include nonhuman stakeholders and what happens when it does. First, it theorizes multispecies communicative democracy (MCD), a theory of deliberative democracy that includes nonhuman stakeholders through direct participation and proxy representation, and applies the theory to the environmental issue of deer-human conflict. Second, it analyzes the social and educational factors influencing US American adults' support for MCD, as well as adults' own explanations of their support. Third, it uses action research to develop, implement, and analyze an MCD curriculum at a nature center. In closing, it highlights the implications of MCD for environmental sociology, policy, and education. |
| 일반주제명 | Sociology. Education. Environmental studies. |
| 언어 | 영어 |
| 바로가기 | 
: 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
