상세정보
Export to Refworks부가기능
Forms of the Peasant: Aesthetics and Social Thought in Russian Realism, 1847-1877
상세 프로파일
| 자료유형 | 학위논문 |
|---|---|
| 서명/저자사항 | Forms of the Peasant: Aesthetics and Social Thought in Russian Realism, 1847-1877. |
| 개인저자 | Flaherty, Jennifer Jean. |
| 단체저자명 | University of California, Berkeley. Slavic Languages & Literatures. |
| 발행사항 | [S.l.]: University of California, Berkeley., 2019. |
| 발행사항 | Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019. |
| 형태사항 | 166 p. |
| 기본자료 저록 | Dissertations Abstracts International 81-03A. Dissertation Abstract International |
| ISBN | 9781085791755 |
| 학위논문주기 | Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2019. |
| 일반주기 |
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
|
| 이용제한사항 | This item must not be sold to any third party vendors. |
| 요약 | At the center of this dissertation's inquiry is Russian realism's construction of what I call "the form of the peasant." Created by writers, this mythic image emerged in tandem with the movement's signature formal innovations in narrative perspective, poetic voice, and descriptive style. It also gave shape to the very ideas of history, national identity, subjectivity, and language which defined Russian realism as a literary movement. The three chapters approach several major texts - Ivan Turgenev's Zapiski okhotnika [Notes from a Hunter] (1847-1852), Lev Tolstoy's "Utro pomeshchika" (1852-1856) and Anna Karenina (1874-1877), and Nikolai Nekrasov's Komu na Rusi zhit' khorosho [Who in Russia Can Live well] (1866-1877) - from a historical and formalist perspective, offering a history of realist forms in the social and intellectual context from which they emerge and to which they contribute. Close readings of narrative and poetic texts are performed alongside analyses of a range of theoretical texts that are central to Russian social thought in the mid-nineteenth century, including works by Vissarion Belinsky, Nikolai Chernyshevsky, Nikolai Dobroliubov, Alexander Potebnia, and G. W. F. Hegel. At the intersection of these analyses emerges a myth of agrarian life structured by social anxieties in three interpretative frameworks. First, realism is illuminated in its parallel development to serfdom abolition. Second, social identities (e.g., master and serf |
| 일반주제명 | Slavic literature. |
| 언어 | 영어 |
| 바로가기 | 
: 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
