대구한의대학교 향산도서관

상세정보

부가기능

Hydrology, Nutrient Removal, and Cost Effectiveness of Small, Edge-of-Field Tile Drainage Treatment Wetlands

상세 프로파일

상세정보
자료유형학위논문
서명/저자사항Hydrology, Nutrient Removal, and Cost Effectiveness of Small, Edge-of-Field Tile Drainage Treatment Wetlands.
개인저자Gordon, Bradley A.
단체저자명University of Minnesota. Water Resources Science.
발행사항[S.l.]: University of Minnesota., 2019.
발행사항Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019.
형태사항186 p.
기본자료 저록Dissertations Abstracts International 81-03B.
Dissertation Abstract International
ISBN9781085636094
학위논문주기Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2019.
일반주기 Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.
Advisor: Lenhart, Christian.
이용제한사항This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
요약Constructing treatment wetlands is a recommended practice for mediating nutrient pollution from non-point sources in the Mississippi River Basin. This research investigated the nitrogen and phosphorus removal effectiveness of a small, edge-of-field, constructed treatment wetland using field, laboratory, and modeling data. In the field, the wetland removed 67% (48-100%) of nitrate discharging from tile drainage but released soil legacy phosphorus from 2013 through 2016. Denitrification in the shallow groundwater and vegetation harvest were the greatest sinks for nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. In the laboratory, three plant communities from the wetland (a wet prairie forb-dominant mix, a switchgrass and prairie cordgrass-dominant community, and a reed canary grass monoculture) were compared for nitrate removal. The wet prairie mix removed the most nitrate, and it had the lowest dissolved oxygen concentration and greatest ratio of denitrifying bacteria to total bacteria (nosZ:16S rRNA genes) - measured using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) - in its root zone. For the modeling component, the ACPF toolbox, the SWAT model, and a spreadsheet model were used to estimate the mass of nitrate-N removed from tile drainage if more edge-of-field wetlands were constructed in the Elm Creek HUC12 watershed. These smaller wetlands removed more nitrate-N per wetland area than larger wetlands (watersheds > 60 ha) but cost the same per mass removed if the small wetlands were designed to have a high saturated hydraulic conductivity. Results from this study suggest that edge-of-field wetlands can be more effective with a dual treatment of surface flow and shallow groundwater flow for nitrate removal and vegetation harvest for phosphorus removal. However, reed canary grass invasion could potentially decrease the nitrate removal effectiveness. If the wetland soils have a high conductivity, the smaller, edge-of-field designs could be as cost effective as large treatment wetlands but remove less land from agricultural production.This dissertation is composed of three individual chapters that will be published in peer reviewed scientific journals. The first chapter pertains to a field study that observed a small, edge-of-field tile drainage treatment wetland. This chapter will be submitted to Ecological Engineering. In the second chapter, the nitrate removal in three plant communities from the wetland was compared using mesocosms. Total bacteria and denitrifying bacterial populations in the root zones of these communities were also compared using qPCR. The work from this chapter was submitted to the Journal of Environmental Quality and is currently under review. The final chapter will be submitted to Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. This chapter compared the effectiveness of small, edge-of-field treatment wetlands with watersheds less than 60 ha to large treatment wetlands with watersheds greater than 60 ha. Multiple models were used to determine the best locations for each wetland in the Elm Creek watershed in southern Minnesota. Conclusions were drawn that small, edge-of-field wetlands are effective nutrient removal practices and can be improved with high saturated hydraulic conductivity, harvested vegetation, and diverse plant communities.
일반주제명Water resources management.
Environmental engineering.
Agricultural engineering.
Hydrologic sciences.
언어영어
바로가기URL : 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.

서평(리뷰)

  • 서평(리뷰)

태그

  • 태그

나의 태그

나의 태그 (0)

모든 이용자 태그

모든 이용자 태그 (0) 태그 목록형 보기 태그 구름형 보기
 
로그인폼