자료유형 | 학위논문 |
---|---|
서명/저자사항 | An Act-focused Theory of Political Legitimacy. |
개인저자 | Bernstein, Justin. |
단체저자명 | University of Pennsylvania. Philosophy. |
발행사항 | [S.l.]: University of Pennsylvania., 2018. |
발행사항 | Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018. |
형태사항 | 279 p. |
기본자료 저록 | Dissertation Abstracts International 80-01A(E). Dissertation Abstract International |
ISBN | 9780438421998 |
학위논문주기 | Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2018. |
일반주기 |
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01(E), Section: A.
Adviser: Samuel Freeman. |
요약 | There is a moral presumption against the possession or exercise of coercive power, but political power is coercive. If we think that political power is sometimes morally justified, then given the moral presumption against coercive power, we need |
요약 | This theory departs in significant respects from existing theories. In Part One of the dissertation, "Four Theses on Legitimacy," I argue that these departures are well-motivated given the shortcomings of these existing theories. I object that t |
요약 | In Part Two, "An Act-Focused Consequentialist Theory of Legitimacy," I develop and defend a theory that embodies this novel approach. I argue that what legitimates particular actions---and, ultimately, the State---is the production of good conse |
요약 | On this theory, a particular action by a state actor is legitimate if and only if the role-based reasons to perform the action are not outweighed by role-independent moral reasons. I propose that there is very strong moral reason to maximize Fun |
일반주제명 | Philosophy. |
언어 | 영어 |
바로가기 |
: 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |