상세정보
Export to Refworks부가기능
Practical Wisdom & Meta-normative Reflection Essays on Moral Aand Legal Normativity
상세 프로파일
| 자료유형 | 학위논문 |
|---|---|
| 서명/저자사항 | Practical Wisdom & Meta-normative Reflection Essays on Moral Aand Legal Normativity. |
| 개인저자 | Atiq, Emad Hanzala. |
| 단체저자명 | Princeton University. Philosophy. |
| 발행사항 | [S.l.]: Princeton University., 2018. |
| 발행사항 | Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018. |
| 형태사항 | 336 p. |
| 기본자료 저록 | Dissertation Abstracts International 79-10A(E). Dissertation Abstract International |
| ISBN | 9780438049642 |
| 학위논문주기 | Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2018. |
| 일반주기 |
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Advisers: Michael A. Smith |
| 요약 | This dissertation's aim is to secure meta-normative foundations for ethics and legal theory. It consists of seven self-contained but interconnected papers. The first four form the first part of the dissertation, entitled "Meta-Normative Foundati |
| 요약 | In chapter 1, "The Hard Problem of Supervenience," I raise and address a challenge facing expressivists: that of explaining why normative properties supervene on repeatable non-normative properties. |
| 요약 | In chapter 2, "How to be Impartial as a Subjectivist," I explain why expressivism and related views do not have unacceptable ethical implications concerning moral disagreement. |
| 요약 | In chapter 3, "On Ground as a Guide to Realism," I raise problems for the dominant view on what distinguishes quasi-realism about normative properties from robust realism, according to which "real" properties play a certain explanatory role. |
| 요약 | In chapter 4, "The Normative Distinction between Quasi-Realism & Realism," I argue that the difference between realism and quasi-realism can be characterized in normative terms. |
| 요약 | In chapter 5, "Juridical Obligations at the Edge of Legality," I argue that the nature of legal normative claims entails that judges have no legal obligation to follow the law in all cases. |
| 요약 | In chapter 6, "Legal vs. Factual Normative Question," I argue that the difference between convention-dependent and convention-independent normative facts entails a difference in how judges should treat normative questions that arise under common |
| 요약 | In chapter 7, "The Limits of Law in the Evaluation of Mitigating Evidence," developed together with Erin Miller, we argue that the difference between legal and moral decision-making is a matter of constitutional significance. |
| 일반주제명 | Philosophy. Law. |
| 언어 | 영어 |
| 바로가기 | 
: 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
