상세정보
Export to Refworks부가기능
The Resurrection of Radical Pacifism: A Defense
상세 프로파일
| 자료유형 | 학위논문 |
|---|---|
| 서명/저자사항 | The Resurrection of Radical Pacifism: A Defense. |
| 개인저자 | Hereth, Stephen Blake. |
| 단체저자명 | University of Washington. Philosophy. |
| 발행사항 | [S.l.]: University of Washington., 2019. |
| 발행사항 | Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019. |
| 형태사항 | 150 p. |
| 기본자료 저록 | Dissertations Abstracts International 81-05A. Dissertation Abstract International |
| ISBN | 9781687934116 |
| 학위논문주기 | Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2019. |
| 일반주기 |
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.
Advisor: Blake, Michael I. |
| 이용제한사항 | This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.This item must not be added to any third party search indexes. |
| 요약 | Within the ethics of self-defense, the predominant view is that there are liability justifications for harming. A minority position, which I call radical pacifism, denies that there are liability justifications for harming. This dissertation offers three separate arguments against the predominant view and for the radical pacifist view. The first paper, "Animal Rights Pacifism," demonstrates how attentiveness to our moral duties to animals generates counterintuitive moral conclusions that can be most plausibly avoided only by appeal to pacifism. The second paper, "Multiple Threats and the Specter of Pacifism," shows that anti-pacifism is itself radical, since it entails that there can be unlimited liability justifications for harming. The final paper, "Against Self-Defense," makes use of Nozickian moral side-constraints and defends the existence of the Cavalier Constraint according to which killing ought never to be done with moral ease. The anti-pacifist view allows for the violation of this constraint, however, and is therefore false. |
| 일반주제명 | Philosophy. Ethics. |
| 언어 | 영어 |
| 바로가기 | 
: 이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다. |
